This image is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Sources:
1. Beall, J. (2012). Predatory publishers are corrupting open access. Nature, 489(7415), 179. https://doi.org/10.1038/489179a
2. Bohannon, J. (2013). Who’s afraid of peer review? Science, 342(6154), 60–65. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.2013.342.6154.342_60
3. Committee on Publication Ethics (2019). Predatory publishing. https://doi.org/10.24318/cope.2019.3.6
4. Eriksson, S., & Helgesson, G. (2017). The false academy: Predatory publishing in science and bioethics. Medicine, health care, and philosophy, 20(2), 163–170. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11019-016-9740-3
5. Sorokowski, P., Kulczycki, E., Sorokowska, A., & Pisanski, K. (2017). Predatory journals recruit fake editor. Nature, 543(7646), 481–483. https://doi.org/10.1038/543481a
6. Wilkinson, T. A., Russell, C. J., Bennett, W. E., Cheng, E. R., & Carroll, A. E. (2019). A cross-sectional study of predatory publishing emails received by career development grant awardees. BMJ Open, 9(5), e027928. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-027928